BB huawei-cloud-gaussdb-count
Count the number of Huawei Cloud GaussDB instances in a region and output the count. Covers both GaussDB for openGauss and GaussDB (MySQL-compatible) instances. Returns the authoritative total_count from the list API, so the reported number is always correct. Read-only — never creates, modifies or deletes any resource. Use for GaussDB database inventory, daily inspection, or cost review. Triggers include: count GaussDB, GaussDB count, GaussDB instance count, how many GaussDB instances, GaussDB数量, GaussDB实例数量, 查询GaussDB数量, GaussDB总数, 统计GaussDB实例数.
Count the number of Huawei Cloud GaussDB instances in a region and output the count.
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 7
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 7
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:12Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionssudo mv hcloud /usr/local/bin/
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:18Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionssudo mv hcloud /usr/local/bin/
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-audit-report.txt:19Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)[WARNING] — Privilege Escalation
detector -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/security-audit-report.txt:21Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)Snippet: sudo mv hcloud /usr/local/bin/
security skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-audit-report.txt:24Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)[WARNING] — Privilege Escalation
detector -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/security-audit-report.txt:26Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)Snippet: sudo mv hcloud /usr/local/bin/
security skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-audit-report.txt:31Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)[WARNING] Privilege Escalation
detector
Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1316 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.