BF huawei-cloud-storage-query
Queries Huawei Cloud storage resources (EVS/OBS/SFS/CBR). Covers cloud disks (volumes/snapshots/types/quotas/recycle bin), OBS buckets (ACL/metadata/notifications/policies/objects), SFS Turbo file systems (shares/perm rules/backend targets/quotas/LDAP/AD), and CBR backups (vaults/policies/backups/tasks/agents/protectables). No write operations. Use this skill when the user needs to query disk info, list buckets/objects, check file system status, or view backup/policy details. Triggers: 云硬盘, EVS, 对象存储, OBS, 文件系统, SFS, 备份, CBR, 存储库, 快照, 桶, volume, bucket, backup, vault.
As a process F 65/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:74Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:107Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/<service_category>/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<service>/guide.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 67 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2384 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (15 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 574: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.