SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC gh-pr-manager

GitHub Pull Request lifecycle management — create, review, merge, changelog generation, CI checks, conflict resolution, and draft management via gh CLI. Use when Codex needs to manage PR workflows, check review status, generate changelogs from merged PRs, or automate the PR creation/review/merge cycle.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ericlooi504 v1.0.1 MIT-0 7 files · 1 script body ≈ 771 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

AnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gh-pr-manager) differs from the folder (gh-pr-flow)
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 7 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 771 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 303: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a transparent GitHub pull-request helper whose powerful GitHub actions are expected for its purpose, but users should confirm merges, reviews, and pushes before running them.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026