SKILLEMALL.ai

BC oc-skill-router

Smart LLM routing brain for OpenClaw. Auto-dispatches tasks to Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi via Evolink API. Cascade strategy cuts costs 60-85%. One API key, 20+ text models.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: EvolinkAI v2.0.0 5 files body ≈ 1 911 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use references/router-api-params.md:54
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)
    curl https://direct.evolink.ai/v1/models -H "Authorization: Bearer $EVOLINK_API_KEY"
    vendor-host

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "user-invokable"

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1911 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed third-party LLM routing skill that sends routed prompts to Evolink and upstream model providers, with no hidden installer, persistence, or unrelated data access found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026