SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC openclaw-workflow-analyzer

分析用户的工作流程，判断哪些环节可以用 OpenClaw（个人 AI Agent）自动化实现。 将工作流拆解为子流程，按 ⭐1-10 星难度阶梯评估可行性，对第三方数据依赖主动确认可用性， 给出先易后难的落地建议和学习路径。 触发词：分析工作流程、workflow analysis、哪些可以自动化、OpenClaw 能帮我做什么、 工作流拆解、自动化评估、automate my workflow。 不适用于：直接执行自动化任务（本 Skill 只做分析和建议）、非 OpenClaw 平台的自动化评估、 具体 Skill 编写（请使用 skill-creator）。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fangshan101-coder v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 800 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "clawhub-slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "clawhub-owner"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 800 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 285: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is an advisory OpenClaw workflow-analysis skill that does not install code, execute actions, or require credentials.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026