SKILLEMALL.ai

AC paper-report-delivery

Build, automate, or maintain a daily paper-report delivery pipeline that collects papers, selects A/B groups, generates Chinese summaries and detailed innovation analysis, produces readable HTML with embedded images, prepares Telegram message chunks, archives outputs, and delivers reports to Telegram with retry and HTML-then-fallback behavior. Use when asked to create or improve a paper/news digest workflow, daily report automation, Telegram delivery pipeline, readable HTML report generation, or fallback delivery logic for unstable Telegram document sending.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: FanWu-fan v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files · 1 script body ≈ 546 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorTelegramData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 30 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 546 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 564: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill’s paper-report and Telegram delivery workflow is mostly coherent, but it can embed arbitrary local files named in image metadata into HTML that may be sent to Telegram.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026