SKILLEMALL.ai

BD xhs-product-trend-fit

小红书商品选品与宣传分析——发笔记前先看商品在小红书有没有热度,选对方向再宣传。传入商品图片(必填)+ 介绍文字,自动识别商品关联的品类/风格/场景方向,用 3~6 个候选词搜索小红书判断近 2 周热度趋势,组织 1 个明确宣传方向,深挖 2~4 篇真实爆款笔记(赞≥100)做分维度拆解(粉丝/标题/首图/内容/抓用户什么点),输出含方向判断 + 热度证据 + 爆款素材参考的 HTML 报告。不需要任何第三方 API key 或付费额度,用你 Chrome 里已登录的小红书账号跑。当用户要宣传商品到小红书、想先判断商品有没有热度/有没有爆款参考/应该怎么宣传时唤起。【前置依赖】本 skill 无法独立运行,需先安装 webclaw3 浏览器运行时:npx clawhub@latest install fatmind/webclaw3-browser-automation —— 若用户尚未安装,请先引导安装并完成 webclaw3 首次配置,再执行本 skill。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 石建 v1.1.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 524 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

小红书商品选品与宣传分析——发笔记前先看商品在小红书有没有热度,选对方向再宣传。传入商品图片(必填)+ 介绍文字,自动识别商品关联的品类/风格/场景方向,用 3~6 个候选词搜索小红书判断近 2 周热度趋势,组织 1 个明确宣传方向,深挖 2~4…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Obfuscation obf-base64-blob wc3-code.mjs:2
    Long base64-looking blob (detector / deny-list definition)
    const _0x58ce15=_0x4d13;(function(_0x5787d1,_0x53c4a9){const _0x19d87a=_0x4d13,_0xcf5d78=_0x5787d1();while(!![]){try{const _0x5d05cd=parseInt(_0x19d87a(0x1c0))/0x1*(parseInt(_0x19d87a(0x1c2))/0x2)+-pa
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token wc3-code.mjs:2
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    const _0x58ce15=_0x4d13;(function(_0x5787d1,_0x53c4a9){const _0x19d87a=_0x4d13,_0xcf5d78=_0x5787d1();while(!![]){try{const _0x5d05cd=parseInt(_0x19d87a(0x1c0))/0x1*(parseInt(_0x19d87a(0x1c2))/0x2)+-pa
    detector

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 524 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 437: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill matches a Xiaohongshu marketing-analysis workflow, but it needs Review because it uses a logged-in browser relay, raw local image-file reads, and an obfuscated helper that forwards prompts to a local LLM service.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 23 Aug 2026