SKILLEMALL.ai

BC goto-codedev-manager

多 IDE / 多 AI 编程 Agent 统一调度 Skill,连接 Codex/Claude Code/QoerCN(Lingma 兼容)/Trae/VS Code/Cursor/Qoder 完成代码开发、Git Diff 分析、EF Core 实体识别、Migration 生成、数据库变更交接单产出、测试构建与开发报告生成

ClawHub Agent Skills author: feixuelingcloud v1.0.0 MIT-0 59 files body ≈ 271 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

多 IDE / 多 AI 编程 Agent 统一调度 Skill,连接 Codex/Claude Code/QoerCN(Lingma 兼容)/Trae/VS Code/Cursor/Qoder 完成代码开发、Git Diff 分析、EF Core 实体识别、Migration…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureVS CodeSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 50. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "trigger_keywords"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "capabilities"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "supported_agents"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "supported_stacks"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "entry_point"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "config_dir"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires_confirmation"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "forbidden_actions"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "example_prompts"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 5 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 271 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 165: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a disclosed coding-orchestration skill, but it requests broad local command, workspace-editing, and database-migration authority with some scoping gaps users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 10 Jul 2026