CF meituan-huisheng-coupon
当用户提到领券、优惠、省钱、活动、打折,或想吃饭/喝奶茶/喝咖啡/吃火锅/烧烤/日料等到店餐饮,或涉及外卖、酒旅、超市、休闲娱乐等美团覆盖的生活服务消费决策,或询问「附近有什么」「哪里有」「今天有什么活动」等探索型问题时触发。支持一键领取美团各品类优惠券、查询今日活动、搜索附近团购商品并下单。
当用户提到领券、优惠、省钱、活动、打折,或想吃饭/喝奶茶/喝咖啡/吃火锅/烧烤/日料等到店餐饮,或涉及外卖、酒旅、超市、休闲娱乐等美团覆盖的生活服务消费决策,或询问「附近有什么」「哪里有」「今天有什么活动」等探索型问题时触发。支持一键领取美团各品类优惠券、查询今日活动、搜索附近团购商品并下单。
As a process F 34/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: <imageUrl>, <url>, activity_link
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.
Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Obfuscation
obf-base64-blobscripts/mtuser-pt-passport-0.1.4.txt:1Long base64-looking blobH4sI…AAC/+x9eXNdx7Gf/s6nI…3SQ+GZAmgAlKJA+O6pX8+cuwA…3cM/ve09t0v0/lL+ktfXF2Xunkp/P64R…NqH/+MtFev+eLj7/l8vP/tZ/Qghn…DNt
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/mtuser-pt-passport-0.1.4.txt:1High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)H4sI…AAC/+x9eXNdx7Gf/s6nI…3SQ+GZAmgAlKJA+O6pX8+cuwA…3cM/ve09t0v0/lL+ktfXF2Xunkp/P64R…NqH/+MtFev+eLj7/l8vP/tZ/Qghn…DNt
Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: <imageUrl> - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: <url> - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: activity_link - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: {payQrCodeImage} - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: {payUrl}
Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: <imageUrl>, <url>, activity_link
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4848 tokens
- 100Steps. 92 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -246 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -38 of 11 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 147: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 63 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 92 items
- +4Has examples (30 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.