SKILLEMALL.ai

AC google-scholar-paper-finder

Use when the user wants to find more relevant academic papers through real-time Google Scholar retrieval with google-scholar-search-mcp, expand search terms from a research topic or seed paper, screen papers by venue quality, or return a ranked literature table with title, authors, year, journal/conference, impact factor, JCR/CAS/CCF/EI/core tags, citations, download/access links, source evidence, and recommendation reasons. Triggers include "Google Scholar 找论文", "google-scholar-search-mcp", "实时搜索论文", "找更多相关论文", "高质量论文筛选", "影响因子", "CCF", "EI", "CSSCI", "北大核心", "文献检索", "参考文献滚雪球", and "返回论文表格".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: FigPad AI v1.0.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 1 787 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Use when the user wants to find more relevant academic papers through real-time Google Scholar retrieval with google-scholar-search-mcp, expand search terms…

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureResearchAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
99/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
97
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 76 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1787 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 599: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 97.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a disclosed academic paper-search helper that relies on an external Google Scholar MCP server and local venue-scoring data, with no hidden persistence or credential behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 11 Jun 2026