BC graph_path_reasoning_analyzer
Analyze and discover paths between entities in knowledge graphs to explain relationships, identify indirect connections, and provide reasoning over traversal patterns. Supports shortest path, all paths, filtering, ranking, and explanation generation.
Analyze and discover paths between entities in knowledge graphs to explain relationships, identify indirect connections, and provide reasoning over traversal…
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 250 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title"
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (graph_path_reasoning_analyzer) differs from the folder (graph-path-reasoning-analyzer)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 56 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2542 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 250: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 54 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
- +4Has examples (27 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.