BF teaching-presentation
为教师从教案生成完整的课堂教学演示文稿（含.pptx文件）。支持教案文件（.docx/.pdf）、网页内容或主题关键词输入，自动完成内容类型判定（A/B/C/D）、结构化JSON大纲生成、role映射、互动设计规划、并最终输出可直接在课堂上使用的.pptx课件。生成的课件不是知识罗列，而是引导教师一步步推进课堂的教学型演示文稿——每页幻灯片都告诉教师"此时该做什么"。触发场景：用户提及"备课"、"教案转PPT"、"教学PPT大纲"、"课堂PPT框架"、"互动教学课件"、"帮我设计一节课的PPT"、"根据这个教案生成课件框架"、"帮我做个讲课PPT"、"课件大纲"、"教学设计"、"生成教学课件"、"做一个课堂用的PPT"、"上课用的幻灯片"等明确教学场景的表述。如果用户只说"帮我做个PPT"而无教学场景上下文，应先询问用途再决定是否触发。
为教师从教案生成完整的课堂教学演示文稿（含.pptx文件）。支持教案文件（.docx/.pdf）、网页内容或主题关键词输入，自动完成内容类型判定（A/B/C/D）、结构化JSON大纲生成、role映射、互动设计规划、并最终输出可直接在课堂上使用的.pptx课件。生成的课件不是知识罗列，而是引导教师一步步推进课堂的教学…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/type-classification.md, references/interaction-patterns.md, references/outline-construction.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/type-classification.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/interaction-patterns.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/outline-construction.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/slide-mapping.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate-outline.js - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/examples.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/quality-checklist.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: references/type-classification.md, references/interaction-patterns.md, references/outline-construction.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1481 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 12 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 373: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.