BF vocational-report-generator
职业教育专业/专业群调研报告与可行性分析报告生成。支持常规性专业调研（7章）和双高专业群建设调研分析（10章），输出MD+HTML双格式。触发条件：用户请求撰写职业教育领域的专业调研报告、人才需求调研、专业建设可行性分析、双高申报材料，或提到"帮我调研一下XX专业""XX专业就业怎么样""专业群可行性""写份XX的调研报告"等涉及职教专业建设决策的口语化请求。不适用于非职业教育领域的行业调研、学术论文撰写或简单的信息搜集。
职业教育专业/专业群调研报告与可行性分析报告生成。支持常规性专业调研（7章）和双高专业群建设调研分析（10章），输出MD+HTML双格式。触发条件：用户请求撰写职业教育领域的专业调研报告、人才需求调研、专业建设可行性分析、双高申报材料，或提到"帮我调研一下XX专业""XX专业就业怎么样""专业群可行性""写份XX的调…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/feasibility-framework.md, references/majors_report_structor.md, references/report-templates.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/feasibility-framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/majors_report_structor.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/report-templates.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/md_to_html.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/数字媒体技术专业调研报告.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: references/feasibility-framework.md, references/majors_report_structor.md, references/report-templates.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 45 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2383 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 213: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.