SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD Vendor Performance Audit

(no description)

ClawHub Agent Skills author: David F. v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 1 585 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
71/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
28
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "price"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "last_validated"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tagline"

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Vendor Performance Audit) differs from the folder (vendor-performance-audit)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 26 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1585 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 28.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a checklist-style vendor review skill with no executable code or hidden behavior, though it may involve sensitive business records during use.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026