CF software-copyright-skill
生成中国软件著作权(软著)登记申请文档。LLM驱动:分析项目代码、生成内容;Python脚本辅助:模板填充、格式保持。
生成中国软件著作权(软著)登记申请文档。LLM驱动:分析项目代码、生成内容;Python脚本辅助:模板填充、格式保持。
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/info_template.docx, templates/manual_template_standard.docx, scripts/test_generate.py
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellreferences/图表工具调研报告.md:66Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell)66|curl -fsSL https://d2lang.com/install.sh | sh -s --
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellreferences/配图生成最佳实践.md:43Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell)43|curl -fsSL https://d2lang.com/install.sh | sh -s --
Files scanned: 61. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/info_template.docx - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/manual_template_standard.docx - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/test_generate.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/常见问题与解决方案.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/专业审阅报告-V4.4.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/短期优化结果.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/docxtpl后处理必知必会.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: templates/info_template.docx, templates/manual_template_standard.docx, scripts/test_generate.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 48 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3177 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 59: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -235 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 40 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 35)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.