SKILLEMALL.ai

CD publicar-ig

Skill para publicar fotos, carruseles (1-10 slides) o reels en el Instagram profesional de la usuaria desde su agente, con la conexión de Instagram que ELLA conectó (Composio, o Zapier si lo tiene). Activar SIEMPRE que pida: "publica esto en Instagram", "/publicar-ig", "sube este carrusel a IG", "publica este reel", "manda esto a Instagram", "haz el post en IG", "publica lo que acabamos de hacer", o cualquier variación que combine un archivo/carpeta de imagen o video con la intención de publicarlo en Instagram. Usa URLs públicas (las de Higgsfield, una que ella dé, o su propio repo público de GitHub si lo conectó). Nunca publica sin mostrar el preview completo y recibir ✅ explícito por Telegram. NO maneja Stories.

ClawHub Claude Code author: Fórmula 100K v1.0.0 MIT-0 1 file body ≈ 2 499 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Skill para publicar fotos, carruseles (1-10 slides) o reels en el Instagram profesional de la usuaria desde su agente, con la conexión de Instagram que ELLA…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureTelegramGitHubZapierMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 41 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2499 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 723: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is not clearly malicious, but it should be reviewed because it can upload local media to a public GitHub repo and publish to Instagram with some scoping and approval ambiguities.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 17 Sept 2026