SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC solo-scaffold

Generate complete project from PRD + stack template — directory structure, configs, CLAUDE.md, git repo, and GitHub push. Use when user says "scaffold project", "create new project", "start new app", "bootstrap project", or "set up from PRD". Uses SoloGraph for patterns and Context7 for latest versions. Do NOT use for planning features (use /plan) or PRD generation (use /validate).

ClawHub Claude Code author: Rust v1.5.1 3 files body ≈ 2 927 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 7 d ago

Generate complete project from PRD + stack template — directory structure, configs, CLAUDE.md, git repo, and GitHub push. Use when user says "scaffold…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: templates/stacks/*.yaml, templates/mcp-skills-bundle.md, templates/principles/harness-engineering.md

GeneratorGitHubSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: templates/stacks/*.yaml, templates/mcp-skills-bundle.md, templates/principles/harness-engineering.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Grep Bash Glob Write Edit AskUserQuestion mcp_…-id mcp_…ocs mcp__solograph__kb_search mcp__solograph__project_info mcp__solograph__project

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/stacks/*.yaml
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/mcp-skills-bundle.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/principles/harness-engineering.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/stacks/
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 33, 52): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/stacks/*.yaml, templates/mcp-skills-bundle.md, templates/principles/harness-engineering.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: templates/stacks/*.yaml, templates/mcp-skills-bundle.md, templates/principles/harness-engineering.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 58 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2927 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 384: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a legitimate project scaffolding skill, but it can create local files, store persistent defaults, use local GitHub credentials, and push a new repository, so users should review it before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026