BC molthreats
Agent-native security signal feed by PromptIntel. Use this skill whenever the agent needs to report threats, fetch protection feeds, apply security rules, or update SHIELD.md. Trigger on any mention of: threat reporting, security feed, MCP threats, malicious skills, prompt injection reports, IOCs, indicators of compromise, agent security, PromptIntel, MoltThreats, SHIELD.md, or SHIELD.md updates. Also trigger when the agent detects suspicious behavior during normal operation (unexpected tool calls, credential access attempts, unknown MCP servers, exfiltration patterns).
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 10
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 10
✓ Guard found no suspicious behaviour. 10 matches are attack strings quoted in this security skill's own documentation.
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (molthreats) differs from the folder (moltthreats)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 74 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3620 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 576: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 28 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.