SKILLEMALL.ai

BF true-seeing

审核 AI 生成文章中的可验证事实,通过 web search 逐条校验,输出差异报告并支持用户审批替换。当用户需要事实核查、验证文章准确性、检查数据日期金额是否正确、去除 AI 幻觉内容、或 fact-check 一篇文章时使用。触发于"事实核查"、"验一下这些数据"、"检查事实"、"去幻觉"、"fact check"、"核实文章"、"核实这段话"、"帮我对一下数据"、"这篇文章里的数字对不对"。不适用于语法纠错、翻译校对、纯观点验证、文风调整。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: francisk v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 923 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: {source_url}, references/fact-extraction-rules.md, references/search-query-templates.md

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: {source_url}, references/fact-extraction-rules.md, references/search-query-templates.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: {source_url}
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/fact-extraction-rules.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/search-query-templates.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/verification-criteria.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: {source_url}, references/fact-extraction-rules.md, references/search-query-templates.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: {source_url}, references/fact-extraction-rules.md, references/search-query-templates.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 85 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1923 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 226: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 85 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is an instruction-only fact-checking skill that uses web searches and waits for user approval before changing text.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026