SKILLEMALL.ai

AD coolskill-builder

Skill 生成与治理节点。将任何资源(GitHub 仓库、API 文档、自然语言需求、代码片段) 转化为零外部依赖、极致省 Token、可被任意生态(Kimi/OpenAI/Claude/自研 Agent)直接调用的标准化 Skill。 触发条件:(1) 用户要求创建/生成/编写一个 Skill,(2) 用户提供资源要求转化为可调用模块, (3) 用户提到零依赖、跨生态兼容、版本隔离等关键词,(4) 用户要求将代码/功能封装为标准化 Skill, (5) 用户要求实现 skill registry、版本管理或安全扫描,(6) 任何涉及 Agent 工具/函数生成的需求。 使用时加载此 Skill,严格按 6 步工作流执行,生成 4 文件(skill.yaml + impl.py + test.py + manifest.json) 并通过 5 层安全校验。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fredtai v1.0.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 403 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 31 h ago

Skill 生成与治理节点。将任何资源(GitHub 仓库、API 文档、自然语言需求、代码片段) 转化为零外部依赖、极致省 Token、可被任意生态(Kimi/OpenAI/Claude/自研 Agent)直接调用的标准化 Skill。 触发条件:(1) 用户要求创建/生成/编写一个 Skill,(2)…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 53 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1403 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 384: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a coherent skill-building tool, but it can automatically create local registry files and push generated content to GitHub when credentials are present, with broad activation and no clear confirmation gate.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jun 2026