SKILLEMALL.ai

AD submit-to-worthtotry

Use when someone wants their product listed on WorthToTry, the AI tool directory. One POST with their URL and email lists it: no account, no API key and no browser consent screen, and we email them a link that finishes it. Covers writing the listing including the founder's own note, what the readiness checks mean, and the badge worth asking them to add. Also use when they say "submit my tool", "list my product", "launch on WorthToTry", or ask why a listing was sent back.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fspecii v0.1.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 2 794 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

One POST with their URL and email lists it: no account, no API key and no browser consent screen, and we email them a link that finishes it.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Use when someone wants their product listed on WorthToTry, the AI … ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (submit-to-worthtotry) differs from the folder (worthtotry-skill)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2794 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 475: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly does what it claims, but its fallback REST workflow asks users to give the agent an access token without enough safety guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 23 Aug 2026