SKILLEMALL.ai

BC deep-research-forge

深度研究与决策分析 skill。用于系统研究一个产品、公司、人物、概念、技术、赛道或文化现象,先选择研究方法论组合,再建立研究问题、证据账本、正式状态层级和结论级引用映射,动态组合时间轴、竞品截面、用户选择、生态地图、因果机制、反方证据、场景推演和决策模块;复杂研究可启用多 Agent 并行执行,把来源搜证、时间线、竞品截面、反方证据和决策综合拆成并行研究小队,最后输出研究报告、决策简报、复盘评分或可复用研究资产。用户会说“研究一下”“深度分析”“竞品分析”“帮我搞懂”“横纵分析”“做个 deep research”“多 agent 并行研究”“这个公司/产品/概念是什么来头”“值不值得关注/投入/学习/跟进”等。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 大痴小乙 v0.1.0 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 1 622 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

深度研究与决策分析 skill。用于系统研究一个产品、公司、人物、概念、技术、赛道或文化现象,先选择研究方法论组合,再建立研究问题、证据账本、正式状态层级和结论级引用映射,动态组合时间轴、竞品截面、用户选择、生态地图、因果机制、反方证据、场景推演和决策模块;复杂研究可启用多 Agent…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security assets/research-envelope-template.md:188
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    ### 5. 反方证据(Red Team Dissent)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/dynamic-output-composer.md:22
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | `decision-brief` | decision question, verdict, evidence, risk, reversal conditions | competitive matrix, monitoring, red team |

Files scanned: 78. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "archetype"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 130 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1622 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 311: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 130 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 14)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is mostly a deep-research assistant, but it also includes persistent self-improvement and command-execution workflows that should be reviewed before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Aug 2026