AF virtual-intelligent-dev-team
Bounded work-loop router for complex software tasks. Routes to the smallest defensible workflow with one semantic lead from 8 specialists (Java Virtuoso, Sentinel Architect, Technical Trinity, Code Audit Council, Git Workflow Guardian, World-Class Product Architect, Data Pipeline Guardian, API Contract Sentinel), attaches copilots only when useful, asks intent-confirmation for fuzzy ideas, and closes with verifiable evidence.
Bounded work-loop router for complex software tasks.
As a process F 60/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/mode-selection-protocol.md, references/subagent-exec-guide.md, references/playbook-index.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 66. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/mode-selection-protocol.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/subagent-exec-guide.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/playbook-index.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/tooling-command-index.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/observability-protocol.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/runtime-routing-rules.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/workflow-bundles.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/team-engine-lite-protocol.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/verifier-extraction-guide.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/decision-log.schema.json - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/routing-rules.json - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/check_harness_health.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/inspect_decision_log.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/emit_telemetry.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/run_stress_scenarios.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/language-profiles.yaml - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "archetype"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Tools and files. 16 referenced file(s) missing: references/mode-selection-protocol.md, references/subagent-exec-guide.md, references/playbook-index.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4582 tokens
- 100Steps. 113 steps
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 429: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 113 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 11)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.