SKILLEMALL.ai

BC multi-agent-pro

支持多Agent流水线编排(采集→分析→报告),基于DAG调度实现跨技能状态共享、错误重断点续传、执行报告生成、HTML甘特图可视化、人工审批节点(含超时策略)、历史执行对比、硬件自适应参数和版本更新提醒。v5.3新增官方流水线模板库(4类预置模板+依赖探测)、任务级重试策略(节点级retry块+退避+降级链)、节点类型归组(7→4类认知归组)、错误恢复命令合并(recover统一入口)、条件表达式增强(re_safe+字符串函数)。AI即编排器,脚本提供基础设施。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fyniujin v5.3.0 MIT-0 34 files body ≈ 5 898 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

支持多Agent流水线编排(采集→分析→报告),基于DAG调度实现跨技能状态共享、错误重断点续传、执行报告生成、HTML甘特图可视化、人工审批节点(含超时策略)、历史执行对比、硬件自适应参数和版本更新提醒。v5.3新增官方流水线模板库(4类预置模板+依赖探测)、任务级重试策略(节点级retry块+退避+降级链)、节点…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5898 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5898 tokens
  • 100Steps. 60 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -237 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -37 of 13 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 235: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 50 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
  • +4Has examples (33 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This workflow-orchestration skill appears useful and not malicious, but it has enough powerful local execution, persistence, broad activation, and under-scoped safety controls to require Review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 24 Aug 2026