SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF codex-dev

Run Codex as a background local job with an immediate receipt, saved logs and patch artifacts, optional Telegram notifications, and explicit workdir support.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fzhlian v0.1.11 MIT-0 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 046 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 50/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/codex-dev-dispatch, scripts/codex-dev-worker, scripts/telegram-notify

ReferenceTelegramSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
50/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/codex-dev-dispatch, scripts/codex-dev-worker, scripts/telegram-notify
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/codex-dev-dispatch
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/codex-dev-worker
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/telegram-notify

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/codex-dev-dispatch, scripts/codex-dev-worker, scripts/telegram-notify
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/codex-dev-dispatch, scripts/codex-dev-worker, scripts/telegram-notify
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
  • 100Steps. 47 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1046 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is for background code-changing jobs, but the package omits the main runtime scripts and includes under-scoped local setup guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026