SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB gate-info-coincompare

Coin comparison. Use this skill whenever the user asks to compare two or more coins. Trigger phrases include: compare, versus, vs, which is better, difference. MCP tools: info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot, info_coin_get_coin_info per coin (or batch/search when available).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: gaixg v1.0.1 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 2 535 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: gate-info-coincompare (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "updated"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_credentials"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_env_vars"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_permissions"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gate-info-coincompare) differs from the folder (gate-info-coin-compare-staging)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 21 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2535 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 278: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This appears to be a crypto comparison guidance skill with a routing-scoping weakness, not a skill that installs code, persists access, or performs hidden actions.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026