BF gate-info-riskcheck
Token and address risk assessment. Use this skill ONLY when the user's query is exclusively about token/contract/address security with no other analysis dimensions. Trigger phrases: is this token safe, check contract risk, is this address safe, honeypot, rug. If the query ALSO mentions fundamentals, technicals, news, sentiment, or any other analysis dimension, use gate-info-research instead — it handles multi-dimension queries in a single unified report. Address risk mode (is this address safe) is exclusive to this skill and must NOT be routed to gate-info-research.
As a process F 47/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/update-skill.*
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/update-skill.* - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "updated" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_credentials" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_env_vars" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/update-skill.*
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gate-info-riskcheck) differs from the folder (gate-info-risk-check-staging)
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 28 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3434 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 572: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.