CC lp-analyze
Assess and compare Uniswap v2, v3, or v4 and Aerodrome or Slipstream liquidity pools before capital is deployed. Use when the user asks which pool to choose, whether LP yield is real, how fees compare with incentives and loss versus rebalancing, or whether token, pool, hook, gauge, and exit risks are acceptable. Read-only; not for building transactions or managing an existing position.
Assess and compare Uniswap v2, v3, or v4 and Aerodrome or Slipstream liquidity pools before capital is deployed.
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, consistency
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill tells the agent to hide things from you: not to show errors, not to mention actions, to report differently from what was done. You lose the ability to see what the agent really did.
Transparency beats a smooth answer. If the goal is to hide technical noise, ask the agent to "summarise briefly", not to "not mention".
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
-
high Concealment
en-hide-from-userSKILL.md:30Instruction to hide actions from the userResolve script and reference paths from this installed skill directory, not the agent workspace. Discover related skills by exact name in the harness; do not assume a sibling directory or silently ins
Medium and low: 1
-
low Concealment
en-hide-from-userreferences/official-tools.md:62Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)For an unsigned plan, use only a currently advertised `prepare_*` capability matching the exact network, protocol, position custody and action. A supported read venue is not automatically supported fo
negated
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (lp-analyze) differs from the folder (galleon-lp-analyze)
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1395 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 388: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.