AD hyperliquid-market-data
Read live Hyperliquid market data from the desk computer with curl or the Python SDK - mid, mark and oracle prices, order book depth, funding (current, predicted, historical), open interest, volume, candles, perp and spot metadata, margin tiers, and how to save datasets for the strategy lab. Read-only, no key. Use for any market brief, depth read, funding question or data pull.
Read live Hyperliquid market data from the desk computer with curl or the Python SDK - mid, mark and oracle prices, order book depth, funding (current…
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (hyperliquid-market-data) differs from the folder (hypergrok-hyperliquid-market-data)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2103 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 380: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.