SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF gasless-crosschain-executor

local-key swap planning and execution skill. Cross-chain (1inch Fusion+, gasless), same-chain gasless (1inch Fusion), and same-chain paid (1inch Aggregation Router v6) paths are bundled. Use when a user asks an agent to quote, validate, sign locally, broadcast, monitor, or recover EVM swaps while keeping private keys on the user's machine.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Alpha_Dev v0.1.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 3 974 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 70/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/node_modules/, examples/generate_wallet.py, examples/preflight.py

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
70/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: examples/node_modules/, examples/generate_wallet.py, examples/preflight.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
60
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Risky intent medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The purpose itself is risky: wallets, browser password stores, offensive security. Even an honest implementation gives the agent access to things that cost money.

For the author

Explain in the description why the access is needed and how it is limited; add tests that show refusals on dangerous requests.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:24
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target
    - Never ask the user to paste a private key, seed phrase, mnemonic, raw keystore password, wallet backup, or one-time code into chat.
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/provider-adapters.md:76
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    Same-chain, NOT gasless, immediate-execution. Returns a regular EVM transaction targeting Aggregation Router v6 (`0x11…A65` on most chains); the user signs and submit
    detector

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/node_modules/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/generate_wallet.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/preflight.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/build_order_fusion_plus.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/build_order_fusion.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/swap_aggregator.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/local_signer.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: examples/node_modules/, examples/generate_wallet.py, examples/preflight.py
  • 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: examples/node_modules/, examples/generate_wallet.py, examples/preflight.py
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 107 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 13 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3974 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 341: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 107 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is about real crypto wallet signing and swaps, but the reviewed package is missing the helper scripts its safety workflow depends on.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026