AC gate-exchange-spot
Gate spot trading and account operations skill. Use when the user asks to buy/sell crypto on spot, check account value, or place conditional/trigger orders. Triggers on 'buy coin', 'sell spot', 'take profit', 'stop loss', or 'cancel order'.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: gate-exchange-spot (ClawHub)
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5629 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "updated" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_credentials" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_env_vars" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gate-exchange-spot) differs from the folder (gate-exchange-spot-v2)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5629 tokens
- 100Steps. 108 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 14 branches, has a failure section
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 240: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 108 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This Gate spot-trading skill is purpose-aligned but needs review because it can place real crypto orders and contains conflicting TP/SL instructions plus broad activation wording.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026