AC gate-exchange-staking
Gate on-chain staking skill. Use when the user asks to stake POS coins, mint, or redeem staked assets. Triggers on 'staking', 'stake ETH', 'redeem staking', 'staking rewards'.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "updated"
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4028 tokens
- 85Steps. 48 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 12 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 175: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 28 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is mostly coherent for Gate staking, but it needs Review because it can submit financial staking or redemption actions and has conflicting/under-scoped safety instructions.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026