SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AA gate-exchange-welfare

Gate welfare center and new-user task skill. Use when the user asks about welfare rewards, tasks, or how to claim benefits. Triggers on 'welfare center', 'new user tasks', 'claim reward'. Must use real MCP data only.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Gate v1.0.3 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 2 965 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process A 80/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: running it twice

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
80/100
Runs to the end
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "updated"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_credentials"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_env_vars"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "required_permissions"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 80/100

    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 49 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2965 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 216: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed read-only Gate welfare helper, with a caveat that vague rewards or task requests could trigger account-status checks unnecessarily.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026