SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC gate-mcp-codex-installer

Gate MCP and Gate skills installer for Codex. Use when the user asks to add Gate MCP or skills to Codex. Triggers on 'install Gate MCP Codex', 'Gate skills Codex', 'setup Gate Codex'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Gate v1.0.2 MIT-0 13 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 290 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 7 d ago

Gate MCP and Gate skills installer for Codex.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal scripts/install.sh:5
      Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)
      # Installs all MCPs when no --mcp is passed. DEX uses fixed x-api-key: MCP_…N7Q

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "updated"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 31 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1290 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 183: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This installer mostly matches its stated purpose, but it persistently changes Codex, fetches unpinned remote skills and packages, and can store trading credentials in plaintext, so it needs review before installation.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Sept 2026