SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD wechat-auto-publisher-skill

公众号自动化技能包 - 从选题到写作到发布全流程自动化，热点监控+AI写作+草稿管理。适合自媒体运营者、内容创作者。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: gdp6539 v1.0.1 16 files body ≈ 606 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention README.md:199
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -e

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wechat-auto-publisher-skill) differs from the folder (wechat-auto-publisher)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 36 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 606 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 58: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -310 of 11 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly generates WeChat article drafts, but its documentation asks for publishing secrets and implies live auto-publishing even though the code does not implement publishing.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026