BC Agentic Test Engineer
AI-powered autonomous test generation and self-healing test maintenance. Generates unit/integration/E2E tests, detects flaky tests, auto-fixes broken selectors, and maintains test coverage. Built for QA engineers and developers. Keywords: AI test automation, self-healing tests, autonomous QA, test generation, Playwright, Selenium, CI/CD testing, flaky test detection, visual AI testing, test coverage, AI-native QA.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Agentic Test Engineer) differs from the folder (agentic-test-engineer)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4956 tokens
- 100Steps. 70 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 417: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.