SKILLEMALL.ai

BF hermes-backup

Multi-platform backup and restore for Hermes Agent and OpenClaw. Backs up configuration, memories, skills, sessions, and workspace. Features: optional encryption, optional cloud storage (S3/Google Drive), incremental or full backups, flexible retention, integrity verification, and web-based management UI. Free and open source.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: geoffguides v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 2 437 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 38/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/serve.sh, scripts/verify.sh, scripts/cloud-upload.sh

AnalyzerGoogle DriveAI and agentsSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
38/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/serve.sh, scripts/verify.sh, scripts/cloud-upload.sh
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege SKILL.md:304
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (negated — the text forbids it)
    - Never `chmod 777` a backup
    negated

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/serve.sh
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/verify.sh
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/cloud-upload.sh

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/serve.sh, scripts/verify.sh, scripts/cloud-upload.sh
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/serve.sh, scripts/verify.sh, scripts/cloud-upload.sh
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (hermes-backup) differs from the folder (complete-agent-backup)
  • 100Steps. 46 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2437 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 328: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 52 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
  • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a mostly coherent backup tool, but it handles credentials and agent state while overclaiming implemented safeguards and leaving restore-time safety gaps.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026