SKILLEMALL.ai

AD aicloud-thought-proxy

云思客(AIcloud-thought-proxy)——通过操控浏览器访问网页版 AI(DeepSeek、Kimi、豆包、通义千问、ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini、Grok 等)与本地 Agent 协同工作以节省 tokens。触发场景:用户要求"用浏览器打开某 AI 官网对话并协作"、"让网页版 AI 规划步骤/编写代码/逻辑推理、本地 Agent 执行"、"节省 tokens"、提到"云思客"等。自动检测浏览器内核(Chromium → chrome-mcp/BrowserSkill;Gecko → GeckoDriver + Marionette),引导用户选择模型/思考模式/联网搜索(含"最新/最强模型"等模糊语言解析),提示用户手动登录与人机验证,建立"网页 AI 出方案、本地 Agent 执行"的协作循环。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: GeorgeChou17 v0.1.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 784 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

云思客(AIcloud-thought-proxy)——通过操控浏览器访问网页版 AI(DeepSeek、Kimi、豆包、通义千问、ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini、Grok 等)与本地 Agent 协同工作以节省 tokens。触发场景:用户要求"用浏览器打开某 AI 官网对话并协作"、"让网页版 AI…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubPlaywrightAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 84 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1784 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 370: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is review-worthy because it can control logged-in browser sessions, install browser-control tools, and relay user requests and execution results to third-party AI sites with limited privacy safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 11 Aug 2026