SKILLEMALL.ai

BF content-creator-pro

Autonomous content creation engine for agents. Writes platform-native posts, threads, newsletters, and long-form articles that meet the highest standards of authentic human writing. Masters hooks, storytelling, and brand voice across Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Reddit, Substack, and short-form video. Applies professional editorial craft to ensure every piece reads with genuine voice and natural rhythm. Tracks performance, learns what works, and improves every week. Triggered by agent-shark-mindset signals. Feeds acquisition-master with ready-to-publish content. Use whenever the agent needs to write or queue content for any channel.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Wesley Armando v1.0.7 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 6 761 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 29/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/human_writing.md

GeneratorAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
29/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/human_writing.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6761 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/human_writing.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 29/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/human_writing.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/human_writing.md
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6761 tokens
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 632: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 37 headings
  • +4Has examples (27 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a coherent content-writing skill, but it needs Review because it can create ready-to-publish public content on schedules, persists performance/voice data, and under-discloses its local Python setup.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026