SKILLEMALL.ai

BF structured-pr-review

Layered PR code review with severity tiers (MUST FIX/SHOULD FIX/SUGGESTION) and addressing-mode. Default: gh CLI only; optional Lobster pipeline.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Grace Gettert v0.1.1 MIT-0 13 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 1 148 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/pr-review-workflow.lobster

AnalyzerGitHubInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
43/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/pr-review-workflow.lobster
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/pr-review-workflow.lobster

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/pr-review-workflow.lobster
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/pr-review-workflow.lobster
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1148 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 145: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 6 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed GitHub PR review helper that can read PR data and, when asked to address feedback, make normal PR updates such as commits, replies, thread resolution, and pushes.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Jul 2026