AC gingiris-github-star-growth
🇺🇸 GitHub Star Sustained Growth Playbook — Monthly 300+ star growth SOP. Content rhythm, community ops, event-driven growth, contributor & ambassador systems. Battle-tested: AFFiNE 0→60K+, Client Project A 0→10K stars. 🇨🇳 GitHub Star 持续增长实操手册 — 月增 300+ Star 的完整 SOP。内容节奏、社区运营、活动驱动增长、Contributor 与 Ambassador 体系。实战验证：AFFiNE 0→60K+、Client Project A 0→10K Star。 🇯🇵 GitHub Star 持続成長プレイブック — 月間300+ Star成長SOP。コンテンツリズム、コミュニティ運営、イベント駆動成長、Contributor＆Ambassadorシステム。実戦検証：AFFiNE 0→60K+、Client Project A 0→10K Star。 🇰🇷 GitHub Star 지속 성장 플레이북 — 월 300+ 스타 성장 SOP. 콘텐츠 리듬, 커뮤니티 운영, 이벤트 기반 성장, Contributor & Ambassador 시스템. 실전 검증: AFFiNE 0→60K+, Client Project A 0→10K 스타. Triggers: "GitHub star growth" | "sustained star growth" | "monthly star growth" | "star growth SOP" | "contributor system" | "ambassador program" | "open source community" | "community growth" | "developer community growth" | "star持续增长" | "Star增长" | "开源社区运营" | "贡献者体系"
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 38 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1392 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 940: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -216 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 12 example trigger phrases
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.