SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF gr-geo-cite

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) 引用追踪 + 优化。每周对 4 大 AI（Claude/GPT/Perplexity/Gemini） 跑固定查询，检测回答里是否引用 gingiris 域名。对未被引用的目标页补 Citable Statistics + llms.txt 条目。 当用户说"我有没有被 AI 引用"、"GEO 优化"、"llms.txt 更新"、"AI 引用追踪"时调用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Iris Wei v1.0.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 1 550 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: URL, scripts/add-citable-stats.py

GeneratorGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: URL, scripts/add-citable-stats.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: URL
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/add-citable-stats.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: URL, scripts/add-citable-stats.py
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: URL, scripts/add-citable-stats.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 45 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1550 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 215: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly aligned with GEO citation auditing, but it under-discloses external AI/provider behavior and credential handling enough that users should review it before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 19 Jun 2026