SKILLEMALL.ai

AD oss-growth-attribution

Reconstruct an open-source project's growth channels, key content, and stage-by-stage attribution from GitHub history and public web evidence. Use this skill when asked to research GitHub star growth, identify launch and amplification channels, explain viral milestones, find representative posts or videos, compare Product Hunt/Show HN/Reddit/KOL impact, or produce an evidence-backed OSS growth attribution report.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Iris Wei v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 642 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Reconstruct an open-source project's growth channels, key content, and stage-by-stage attribution from GitHub history and public web evidence.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubData and analyticsMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 642 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 416: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a purpose-aligned research workflow for reconstructing open-source project growth from public GitHub and web evidence.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 18 Aug 2026