SKILLEMALL.ai

BD content-fetch-skill

多站点网页内容抓取工具,基于 Playwright 浏览器自动化抓取 Twitter/X.com 推文、知乎文章/回答、微信公众号文章、今日头条、虎嗅等站点,以及任意通用网页。统一通过 URL 自动匹配站点并执行抓取,输出结构化 JSON、页面截图和图片。当用户要求"抓取/爬取/下载/获取"网页文章、推文、公众号文章、知乎回答、新闻内容时使用。触发词:抓取推文、爬取 Twitter、爬取 X、下载推文、抓取知乎、爬取知乎、抓取公众号、爬取微信文章、抓取头条、爬取头条、抓取虎嗅、爬取虎嗅、抓取网页、爬取文章、下载文章、获取网页内容、保存网页、采集内容。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RuiChong v1.0.0 MIT-0 12 files · 7 scripts body ≈ 1 120 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 8 d ago

多站点网页内容抓取工具,基于 Playwright 浏览器自动化抓取 Twitter/X.com 推文、知乎文章/回答、微信公众号文章、今日头条、虎嗅等站点,以及任意通用网页。统一通过 URL 自动匹配站点并执行抓取,输出结构化…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedurePlaywrightCloudflareSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process references/troubleshooting.md:151
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    nohup ./mihomo -d . > /tmp/mihomo.log 2>&1 &

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1120 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 278: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 6 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This scraping skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can use cookies or browser sessions to scrape broad web targets while weakening browser security protections.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026