AC study-plan-maker
Use this skill when creating personalized study plans, learning roadmaps, or skill acquisition schedules. Activates on requests like "make a study plan for X", "how do I learn Y in Z weeks", "create a learning roadmap for [skill/exam/topic]", or "help me prepare for [certification/exam]".
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1306 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 289: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.