SKILLEMALL.ai

BC concept-validation-tech-validation-engine

概念验证中心技术验证引擎。当用户需要验证技术可行性、评估TRL等级、设计技术验证方案、进行多路线并行对比时使用。本技能是验验(技术验证师)的核心工具,支持TRL 1-4阶段的技术成熟度评估、3维轻一致性验证、技术风险识别。适用于技术方案评估、原型验证设计、技术路线对比等场景。与中试基地工艺熟化引擎(TRL 5-7)形成衔接,概念验证阶段结束后交付技术验证报告。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: golngod v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 3 060 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

概念验证中心技术验证引擎。当用户需要验证技术可行性、评估TRL等级、设计技术验证方案、进行多路线并行对比时使用。本技能是验验(技术验证师)的核心工具,支持TRL 1-4阶段的技术成熟度评估、3维轻一致性验证、技术风险识别。适用于技术方案评估、原型验证设计、技术路线对比等场景。与中试基地工艺熟化引擎(TRL…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Analyzertype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3060 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed Chinese-language framework for technical concept validation and does not request unusual system access or hidden authority.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jul 2026