BD opc-project-lifecycle
OPC项目全流程管理，每个项目创建独立档案，覆盖从立项到交付的完整生命周期
OPC项目全流程管理，每个项目创建独立档案，覆盖从立项到交付的完整生命周期
As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-shortdescription under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2962 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 37: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -230 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 42 headings
- +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is mostly a disclosed project-archive workflow, but it also asks for broad persistent project data collection and includes privileged skill-creation/patching behavior that should be reviewed before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026