SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD opc-tech-transfer

技术成果转化全流程管理，覆盖从实验室成果到商业产品的转化路径规划与执行

ClawHub Agent Skills author: golngod v1.0.0 MIT-0 13 files body ≈ 7 970 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 29 h ago

技术成果转化全流程管理，覆盖从实验室成果到商业产品的转化路径规划与执行

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
56
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-short description under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 7970 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7970 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 57 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 35: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 153 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (35 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a non-executable technology-transfer consulting skill; its main risk is that users must handle consent and confidentiality carefully before sharing project materials.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026