CD chinese-official-writing
用于中文公文、事务性材料和新闻稿件的起草、改写、压缩、润色、审校、文种核对、去口语化、降 AI 味及 Word 格式处理，适用于机关、企事业单位、学校和新闻机构。涵盖申请、请示、报告、通知、通告、意见、决定、决议、议案、公报、命令、函、复函、批复、说明、方案、纪要、公告、公示、通报、制度、规定、办法、细则、操作规程、工作要点、总结、调研、讲话、致辞、主持词、述职、可研、审查材料、技术需求、新闻消息、编者按、新闻评论，以及采购、整改、反馈和 AI 算力等场景。
用于中文公文、事务性材料和新闻稿件的起草、改写、压缩、润色、审校、文种核对、去口语化、降 AI 味及 Word…
As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/trial-draft-routing.md, references/targeted-checks.md, references/writing-rules.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/trial-draft-routing.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/targeted-checks.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/writing-rules.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/trial-draft-routing.md, references/targeted-checks.md, references/writing-rules.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 727 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 231: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 77)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.