BF lark-contact
飞书 / Lark 通讯录,用于按姓名 / 邮箱把员工解析成 open_id,以及按 open_id 反查员工的姓名 / 部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式。当用户说出某人姓名而下一步需要发消息 / 加群 / 排日程时,先用本 skill 把姓名换成 ID;当输出里出现 open_id 需要展示成姓名给用户看,或用户直接询问某人的部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式时,用本 skill 查。不负责部门树遍历、按部门列员工、组织架构图,这类需求走原生 OpenAPI。
飞书 / Lark 通讯录,用于按姓名 / 邮箱把员工解析成 openid,以及按 openid 反查员工的姓名 / 部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式。当用户说出某人姓名而下一步需要发消息 / 加群 / 排日程时,先用本 skill 把姓名换成 ID;当输出里出现 openid…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../lark-im/SKILL.md, ../lark-calendar/SKILL.md, ../lark-openapi-explorer/SKILL.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../lark-im/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../lark-calendar/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../lark-openapi-explorer/SKILL.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../lark-im/SKILL.md, ../lark-calendar/SKILL.md, ../lark-openapi-explorer/SKILL.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 288 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 228: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.